Layoffs a stressor for schools employees
by Lauren Jones, Staff Writer
Feb 10, 2013 | 12994 views | 14 14 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The hallways of Floyd County Schools were abuzz with anxious whispers exchanged from teacher to teacher regarding the Board of Education’s announcement that major staff cuts are coming Tuesday.

Understandably, the news made many teachers uneasy about the future of their professions — since the Reduction in Force plan calls for lopping more than $7 million from the salary budget in the next school year.

The bulk of it, $4.1 million, will come from instruction and $1.2 million will come from school administration.

According to the RIF plan, the rest of the staff cuts include $700,989 in the pupil services sector, $494,876 in general administration, $298,511 in maintenance, $95,989 in transportation and $91,997 in business services.

Teachers declined to speak on the record about the RIF plan, stating that the atmosphere within the school system was too volatile right now to rock the boat. The Rome News-Tribune is breaking precedent to allow anonymity in order to share the concerns of so many local residents.

One woman who works at a Floyd County school did say that the RIF plan wasn’t completely unexpected.

She said she feels administrators’ hands are being forced — via years of state budget cuts — but they have the best interest of the system at heart and would do what they can to save as many jobs as possible.

A teacher agreed to an interview on the condition that an alias be used to identify him. “Peter,” 39, has been with the Floyd County system for three years and at another school system for a decade before that.

He said a lot of people expected furloughs and some layoffs, but didn’t think the RIF would be “as drastic as what they’re doing.”

“I’m a little nervous, but I understand why other people are more nervous,” Peter said. “I think, as a science and math teacher, I’m probably more secure. And if I do get let go, I feel readily able to get a job somewhere else. But it’s difficult to plan, and a lot of people are living paycheck to paycheck. If they don’t have a job, it could make things very difficult very quick.”

He said a positive note is that the layoff notifications come next week, rather than at the end of the school year.

“Tuesday, I can live with that,” he said. “Because it’s better to find out now than to wait until May and (hear) ‘You don’t have a job, find one for next year.’ That would be much worse.”

But Peter said he thinks the school system has known for some time there would have to be a reduction and Superintendent Jeff McDaniel was hired because of his reputation as a “clean-up man” administrator.

“I do think that the last superintendent (Lynn Plunkett) glossed that over a little bit and made things seem better than they were,” he said.

The new teachers, he said, are under the impression that they’re likely to be the ones laid off because they’re lower on the totem pole. And, along with the anxiety coursing through school corridors, is skepticism about how the RIF will be handled.

McDaniel released a lengthy plan, but Peter said it’s short on specifics — and personalization.

“Some people wish that it was handled in-house, within the schools, instead of handled from the central office down,” he said. “But I’m sure in some ways, the principals are glad they don’t have to make that decision.”

An RN-T.com report on the board’s announcement drew more than 100 comments from online posters — many of whom favored the impersonal process.

“I do feel that cronyism would come in to play if (the principals) did get to choose,” one wrote. “I also think that Dr. McDaniel is taking a lot of flack for something he didn’t cause.”

The comment continued with a call for action: “It is a terrible situation, and I’m one that could lose my job in this RIF. I strongly believe that citizens of Rome and Floyd County should contact our representatives and senators because they’re the ones that get the say-so in cutting funding.”

Peter said there are some scheduling adjustments to save money, and most employees probably realize there’s a need — and room — for a little workforce shrinkage.

“But slightly overstaffed is different from a third reduction in personnel,” he said.

He ticked off categories of employees who are likely the most worried about the coming RIF: teachers married to other teachers, which is not uncommon; staffers who are the sole breadwinner, and insurance-provider, for their families; and teachers in specialized areas.

“Technology classes, art classes, elective classes and paraprofessionals, those people see themselves as very vulnerable,” he said. “Theres a guy that’s been teaching more than 10 years, but, he teaches an elective class that’s likely to get cut and he’s just wondering if they’re going to move him into another area where he can teach or will his job be gone?”
Comments
(14)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
NoFreakinWay
|
February 15, 2013
I suggested a 5% across the board pay cut when this story first ran. I was surprised at how many rejected the idea.

For someone who makes 100k or more, a 5% cut is out of the question. RIF is the ONLY answer. I wonder how many of them will be select for RIF? My guess is none.

I also wonder why the BOE promotes teachers to administrative positions that they are not necessarily qualified for. Does it really take 80k and a teacher certificate to fill these positions?

If the BOE was a private business, they would have closed their doors long ago. Maybe it’s time to leave teachers in the classroom while bringing in some fresh talent to run the BOE.

tedb3rd
|
February 11, 2013
Momzie, If they're going to cut the pay, do it across everybody employed by BOE. If they cut it by 5%, then EVERYBODY gets 5% cut (or whatever is deemed necessary). If you just cut the 'big earners' then they'll go elsewhere. And then some idiots (or even CRIMINALS) will come in and take their place. No school system is absolutely perfect but, if you watch the news, Floyd County is in a lot better condition than some other places.. That's because the leadership (those 'Big Payrolls' as you call it) made wise decisions in the past. BOE is stuck between a rock and a hard place. They're doing what Government, in general, should have done many years ago. BOE just can't go raising the debt ceiling and borrowing more money. Everybody wants free cell phones, free healthcare, free, free, free.. Well. The money has to come from somewhere.
reddersonja
|
February 12, 2013
It doesn't come from school taxes. Sad:

http://www.rn-t.com/view/full_story/8441297/article-Members-of-the-public-tell-city-of-Rome-to-make-more-cuts-instead-of-raising-tax-rate?instance=article_results
lynskin50
|
February 11, 2013
Priorities first! Start in the Central Office before you cut teachers! It makes me sick to think one would sacrifice a teacher before a position that probably could have been cut out of that office a long time ago! Just saying!
Momzie
|
February 11, 2013
GREAT! Classrooms are to full now! Instead of teachers loosing their jobs, cut back on all those BIG payrolls within the Central Office of The Board of Education. Some of you would fall over if you knew what they were paid and they do NOT teach the kids anything. This so burns me up!!!!!!! Leave the teachers cut BIG PAYROLLS!
reddersonja
|
February 12, 2013
Whoa. Here's someone who didn't make the most of her English classes.
richardcranium
|
February 10, 2013
Announcing an RIF prior to implementation creates an adversarial work environment that many organizations never fully recover from. Too bad for the kids. They're pawns in an adult world.
ohmy!
|
February 10, 2013
this is a really scary time for our country, I do not blame the current administrators nor the county office but I place all blame on our elected officials at the state level who have continued to allow Georgia to fall so far behind the rest of the United States in education. Most of those in elected positions do not even send thier own children to our public schools! What does that say about their priorities? There are great teachers and there are bad teachers just like any other profession, but allowing the good to be branded with the bad is sad. Sports, band, drama, art, home ec, all offer our students differant electives to learn life skills, if cuts are made they should be in ridiculous spending like too many people doing the same job.
Trelicious
|
February 10, 2013
I have considered, on almost a monthly basis, a career change from my current field to teaching for the past two years. The job I have is fairly secure but I've been torn to move into the medical field or teaching for a while.

Wiping my brow that I did not flip the switch and go into teaching.

I feel bad for all these people.
IMNSHO
|
February 10, 2013
I wonder how much would be saved if they were to eliminate the sports programs and simply get back into the education business?
TheSeer
|
February 10, 2013
Sports and fine arts are as integral to education as academics, That said, high school sports programs in Georgia are not funded by tax monies. Their operations are funded by gate receipts and booster clubs.
NoIdea
|
February 10, 2013
Do booster clubs pay the $80,000 salary of PE/Health teachers aka football coaches?
blahblah6111
|
February 11, 2013
I know many people's first idea is to cut sports programs, but many young people would just drop out of school if they didn't have that as an incentive to continue. It even encourages them to keep up their grades in order to play. If the graduation rate is important, you can't simply cut out athletics. It would be nice if things were so simple.
PalominoGold
|
February 10, 2013
I had commented about this in another thread but I feel sorriest for the good teachers who will lose their jobs, now that it's been announced that performance will play such a big part. They will forever be tarred with the same brush that the poor performers will. It may not be their fault that they teach an elective or that they were last hired of the English teachers but now they're going to have to answer "yes" on teaching job applications that ask if they've been involuntarily released from a teaching job. Many districts won't touch you if you answer yes to that.

And as for science and math teachers being safe? Cobb County released a ton of them 3 years ago and many are still unemployed, as are other critical-field teachers.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.