Officials looking for ways to get county support for SPLOST packages
by Doug Walker
7 months ago | 1219 views | 15 15 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rome Mayor Wright Bagby had an interesting idea Tuesday concerning a meeting to get more broad based support for sales tax projects — invite those who usually say no.

Alan Horne, global sales supervisor for Suzuki Manufacturing in Rome, told members of the Rome-Floyd Development Authority that a meeting has been called for Jan. 11 to discuss how the special purpose, local option sales tax message can be better presented to residents in unincorporated Floyd County, where support for sales taxes is often lacking.

Floyd County Commission Chairman John Mayes suggested that leading figures in the various communities outside of Rome be invited to attend the meeting.

Bagby went a step further.

“We need some aginners; it’s going to bite us some day,” said Bagby.

SPLOST packages have brought a lot to Rome and Floyd County — The Forum, State Mutual Stadium, road improvements and sewage infrastructure improvements.

City Manager John Bennett told the authority that having a citizens’ committee develop the last several packages has lent some credibility to the final list of projects put forth to voters.

In spite of that so-called credibility, it’s not been unusual for SPLOST packages to be decided by razor-thin margins, often with the city voting yes and unincorporated voters no.

The 2001 vote for a new baseball stadium to house the Rome Braves passed by a margin of 142 votes. The 2003 package highlighted by funding for a new health department and a major upgrade of the city’s sewage treatment plant passed by only 67 votes. The 2009 SPLOST that featured a major upgrade of the emergency communications network passed by just 169 votes.

There are similarities in each of those three extremely close elections. Fewer than 27 percent of the voters in Everett Springs voted for any of the three packages.

Fewer than 40 percent of the turnout in the North Carolina precinct, which is the Coosa area, voted for any of the SPLOSTs. Forty-four percent is the highest approval rate from the Watters precinct, the Shannon community.

The Howell precinct, in the Wax-Flint Hill area, is typically in the 30-percent range though 41 percent did go for the Stadium SPLOST. Foster’s Mill, between Coosa and Cave Spring, is another precinct where less than 42 percent of the voters approved any of the three packages.

In other business the Rome-Floyd Development Authority met behind closed doors to discuss property acquisition; no votes were taken.

The Rome-Floyd Authority will conduct a joint meeting with the Development Authority of Floyd County on Friday. Both authorities are partners in options on property at the intersection of highways 53 and 140. Part of the SPLOST package that just passed included funds for the actual purchase of that property for future industrial use.

Greater Rome Chamber of Commerce President Al Hodge said his staff continues to be busy showing off properties to potential industrial clients. He also reported a number of existing industries have expressed interest in expansion. Hodge said Bekaert Corp. has recently added about 20 employees.

Chamber officials recently hosted Antje Abshoff, the director of European Operations for the Georgia Department of Economic Development.

A couple of German attorneys participated in the chamber’s recent Innovation conference. They represent a number of German firms looking toward possible expansion in the U.S. Abshoff office in Munich.

Click here to see how precincts voted in the most recent SPLOST
comments (15)
« mark125 wrote on Sunday, Dec 20 at 09:59 AM »
Here's an idea for a splost package.

Make it the "lower your property taxes splost".

I would vote for that.

Don't spend it on anything, just use it to lower my property taxes.
« anabelle_lee wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 07:47 PM »
Does anyone know if the roof is still leaking at Coosa High School. It was when my kids attended. This was supposed to be fixed twice once with splost money and once with money that the school was awarded for some sort of recognition. I can't remember the details. Does anyone remember this. What happened there.
« tincup3535 wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 07:34 PM »
i just belive that having a updated 911 communication's center is more important as of right now, which was approved by the voter's using a splot. is just so much more important

to the city and county to save live's, and protect it's citizen's, and business's. than wasting money on grass for a football field.

LIVE'S AND SAFTY SHOULD BE PUT BEFORE GRASS.

NOTHING IS ENSURED OR GUARENTEED IN LIFE BUT

TAXES AND DEATH! NAIA MIGHT GET A BETTER DEAL FROM ANOTHER CITY.as i stated i did in fact vote aganst the splot. but it passed so i will pay my fair share, and nothing is being bulit in my back yard. and yes i will benfit from it passing

i hope. but again i just really feel the voter's

were misled as to which project's were really important. would any one have voted yes to the spolt. if they had said that the first project was in fact going to be putting new grass on a football field? and not the communication center.

i just do not belive that.
« RomeWrecker wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 10:17 AM »
The reason they are pushing the new grass at the stadium ahead is because it will ensure that the NAIA national championship game continues to be held in Rome, therefore adding more money to the local economy from outside sources.

I live in the county and I support the SPLOST. Just because they don't build something in my backyard doesn't mean I can't take advantage of it.
« tincup3535 wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 08:30 AM »
i have voted aganst every single splot, from the first one. and i will contenue to do so. just what happened to the splot money to reopen the lock and dam? why do cave spring's not pay county

taxe's?i know for a fact that the upstart cost for the communication system will only be a drop

in the bucket, maintaining the system will be where the real cost will add up. the county and city has known about the need to upgrade for over three year's but they took 100 % no action

on this matter at all. as reported in the rn-t. by county manager poe.i'm not aganst the upgrade

i just belive three year's ago, it could have been done much cheaper, and higher quality. also

it seem's to me they are more interested in the grass on a stupid football field, than on this project.just plain stupid, grass over live's!

if they ever let the voter's, vote on each project included in a splot, i just might change my mind.
« mark125 wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 07:54 AM »
I read the splost on the computer screen before I voted. I had to vote no. Partly because of high price tag for the communication system and the fact that money would be borrowed by issuing bonds before the tax was actually collected.

I agree that the communication system is outdated and does not work very well but I know there are other less costly options other than what was proposed.

Why can't they wait on the money to come in before spending it?

It makes no sense to borrow against the expected tax revenue and pay interest.
« ssrusty wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 07:12 AM »
I was all for the SPLOST deal, because I was sold on three points. #1-Everyone who shops in Rome/Floyd co will pay/continue to pay this extra penny tax, not just the residence of the the City/county through property taxes.

#2-The current SPLOST deal is due to expire soon so this wouldn't be a "new" tax but basically a continuation of a system already in place.

#3 The biggest reason I was was sold, and probably many people were with me, was the fact our communications system for 911 is out dated and will be useless for the new FCC regulations coming quickly coming down the pike.

Having said that it makes me livid to hear the first project is going to be changing the grass in the stupid high school football stadium. I my opinion if it is touched at all with the tax $$ then it should be the very last project to be accomplished, not the first, there IS already grass there. I have been on it myself many times before.

As far as missing a penny here and a penny there, that is how this country has gotten to be taxed at or near 50%. I would love for politicians to keep their hands out of the different pots to get their pet projects done, and then raise taxes so that the necessary entities have money to operate, but we all know THAT wont happen, not now, not ever.
« Tac1333 wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 02:06 AM »
What can I say. I agree with most of you about hating to see our Taxes increased, But I would much rather pay a TAX that everyone pays, no mater who you are,then to have my property TAX increased. There is one thing that I would really like to see added to the next splost. Increase Sidewalks around the County. But that is just my opinion.
« Tac1333 wrote on Wednesday, Dec 16 at 01:57 AM »
« RealEstateMystic wrote on Tuesday, Dec 15 at 02:23 PM »
I'm always amazed at how exercised people get around here over SPLOSTs -- not as taxes necessarily (opposition to which remains an article of faith among the True Believers) but as painful inflictions of pain and suffering. A few pennies here and there never hurt me and I doubt hurt anyone else; you can find dozens of them on the sidewalk, so obviously a lot of folks really don't care about their coppers. The only thing I suppose I resent is that all this money, when it's finally collected, inevitably goes to fund some project that will have zero impact on me (e.g. a stadium, a parking deck) and that in any case no doubt turns out to be a Christmas present to some wealthy campaign donor or country club pal.

But heck, I'd rather them take my pennies for such boondoggles than my dollars.
« CapitolG wrote on Tuesday, Dec 15 at 02:08 PM »
I would like to take that extra penny I spend over the year(s) to fund my home repairs and whatever else I need. We get taxed, then taxed, then taxed again, and I'm sick and tired of it! We actually have a committee that dreams up ways to spend money that was NEVER intended for them to have in the first place. I really think that most people that vote "yes" for these things don't know what there voting for.
« middleoftheroad wrote on Tuesday, Dec 15 at 12:45 PM »
Only a politician could decide that MORE input is necessary on all these proposed SPLOST packages. The real problem is INFORMATION OVERLOAD on teh commissioners and the deeply-rooted fear of every politician of being 'un-elected'. This usually results in promises being made that create too many options for SPLOST committees (which in and of themselves are jokes and should be renamed 'Committee of Buddies of the Commissioners') to consider. What should happen is that the local commissioners should limit the SPLOST to what it was originally intended and stop trying to be a friend to the deep pockets in town. Truth is; the SPLOST is no longer 'Special' in these parts . . . it has come to be looked upon by the commissioners as an entitlement. Slow down - let Rome be Rome - we don't need another Atlanta. And just why is the global sales supervisor of Suzuki telling the local Development Authority when there is going to be a meeting regarding SPLOST packages?
« middleoftheroad wrote on Tuesday, Dec 15 at 12:34 PM »
??
« tedb3rd wrote on Tuesday, Dec 15 at 12:24 PM »
Here's how you can convince me for SPLOST... STOP WASTING MY INCOME TAX (and all the other taxes that are burdened on us) and use THAT MONEY for things that are needed... Then you're SPLOST problem will be solved because... Then we won't need a SPLOST.

It's sad when we have to have a special tax for the basics like a communication system... These are things that should be covered under the taxes we already pay. SPLOST should go for things that are nice but not needed--like pedestrian bridges, tennis court lights, and roads to bring in more traffic congestion.

Luckily I live in Southern Floyd County so I can go to Polk County for shopping when this goes into effect. I figure it will save our family about $350.

« Countyvoter wrote on Tuesday, Dec 15 at 11:38 AM »
How about making the distribution of SPLOST projects fair for county residents? The vast majority of SPLOST projects benefit City residents aside from token projects included seemingly to "toss a bone" to county voters for support.

Plus, you have areas like Southern Floyd County in the Silver Creek and Lindale that seem to get passed over for SPLOST projects. Oh wait! We got new lights on the tennis courts at Gilbreath! But wait... They can't be used since the Rec Department is only opens the center a few hours a week due to budget cuts! So, new lights but what are they good for?