Sexual assault charges against former Model coach dropped
by John Bailey
Nov 09, 2009 | 5391 views | 19 19 comments | 30 30 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A Supreme Court ruling in a Richmond County case has brought about a decision to drop sexual assault charges on a former Model High School basketball coach accused of having sexual contact with a student.

Daniel Lowell Brown was arrested in November 2008 on sexual assault charges after police said he was involved in a consensual teacher-student relationship.

But a June 2009 ruling in Chase v. State by the Georgia Supreme Court stated that a lower court erred in the trial of a teacher charged with having sex with a student by not considering if the relationship was consensual.

“The Chase decision affected cases like ours across the state,” said District Attorney Leigh Patterson. The high court’s ruling has caused DAs in many districts to drop charges they otherwise would not have, she said.

“The statute is, as designed at present, is so blatantly wrong,” she said. “I can’t even wrap my mind around it.”

However, state representatives plan to present a bill to the legislature to clarify the statute in the next legislative session, Patterson said.

There has not been an official decision made about the other ex-coach, Matthew Blanton, charged in the case as of Monday.

Both ex-coaches accepted the Floyd County School superintendent’s recommendation for immediate termination and gave up rights to a due process hearing before the school board.

Comments
(19)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
FormerRoman
|
August 18, 2011
Wrong Mip..just look at our Attorney General Holder..He decides which laws he wants to enforce..
freedomofspeechI8
|
August 18, 2011
Times have changed since these two boys abused those students. They would not get away with it now. I hope they both know this.
anonymous
|
November 13, 2009
Blah Blah Blah,

I like how you let everyone know what your comment was going to be just by your name.

When there are people out there using mind-games and authority to manipulating adolescents into sex, it IS our business. It's everybody's responsibility to protect children. Words can't describe how much both of these people belong under the jail until they die and spend an eternity in hell.

Don't know who he is as a person... Uhh.. We beg to differ... People are defined by what they do. Let's take a look: Hmmm... Adult who has sex with teenagers. Wow--Something that all parents hope they get to one day say about their kid!! These two are scum. They provide no contribution to society.

They will make great fathers if incest is determined to be beneficial and healthy. In any other situation, no, sorry. Scum.

Danial Brown innocent of what? So you're saying it's OK and you have no problems with a teacher using their authority to manipulate a less-mature teenager into sex. "Teacher sleeping with student." Boy, that screams "appropriate." Sure, maybe it wasn't against the law by definition. But myself, and I would guess a majority of people, would say that "person" Daniel is one sick !@#$. If you want to think otherwise, you just keep that head of yours buried in the sand... Sing: LA-LA-LA to yourself, Blahblahblah.

hello88
|
November 12, 2009
Honostly, when did this become a bash on people that graduated from Model? Everyone has their opinions and that's fine. However, I graduated from Model and I have a wide vocabulary and make very little grammatical errors. I pride myself on that. Maybe I'm just one of the few that happened to pay attention in class. Who knows??

But seriously, it's all of a sudden a bash on people who graduated from Model and not about the two men in this report? Please, get a life people. Sex scandals happen all the time, by no means making them right, and this is not the first time something like this has happened at Model. Being a student who graduated from there I would know. In my days at the high school there were two teachers that committed similar acts and yet it was not as widely publicized as this.

One resigned from the school and last time I saw, however it was over four years ago, he and the student he was involved with were still together. She was eighteen at the time and that's probably the only reason it was not publicized as much. Still a student/teacher relationship however, which is unethical, but not illegal since she was of age.

The other teacher also resigned in the middle of the school year because of allegations that were brought up, but no charges were filed. He moved to a different state and as far as I know still resides there. Which makes me think the allegations were true considering he had not fulfilled his contract with the school and yet they had no problem with terminating it prematurely.

So as you can see, this has been a common accurance at Model as far back as I can remember. Nothing new about it, just different coaches this time and the girls were not of age. Which is why it's gotten so much publicity. Like I said, not right morally or ethically, but not new.
anonymous
|
November 12, 2009
b_xox,

Your post is barely readable.

I bet you graduated from Model too.

b_xox
|
November 12, 2009
I think that Brown should deffently be in jail. This might be his first offence, but from what I saw, its not the first that he has done.

throw his ass back in jail.
anonymous
|
November 12, 2009
To Fatherknowsbest,

I read your comment after mine, and i must admit i took what you said the wrong way. I offer my apologies to you on that. However the first comment that brought the "WHITE" comment into it i still cant figure. Once again i apologize for my missunderstanding of your meaning.
Scorpio21au
|
November 11, 2009
To Voter: riding crop only; however, I do think what this "teacher" did was inexcusable and some prison time should have been the end result.

fatherknowsbest
|
November 11, 2009
Oh, I now see the light...how ignorant of me. Let's line up all of our sweet Georgia peaches when they reach the ripe old age of let's say 14 to start priming them to be taken advantage of by one of our local so-called professionals of the community. I know the law might state that consensual is 16, but like others on the books, it is stupid and out dated. You can't vote until you are 18, you can't legally drink until 21, etc.., but it is totally acceptable to condone such behavior in our schools(IN OUR SCHOOLS!!). I have teenagers in school and don't think that I or they are better than anyone else or that we are above something like this happening to our family, but to sit back and think that it is alright is simply outrageous in this day and time. As a parent, I will never accept this as behaviour that should be tolerated, you may and that is your right, but I don't think I am the minority on this issue.
fatherknowsbest
|
November 10, 2009
I am not wishing that to happen to another 16 year CHILD, my post was taken way out of context. As a parent of teenagers, I know first hand how it is to worry about a child and the "beast" out there that will prey on innocent children...you may think that a 16 year old is enough to make those type of decisions, but they are not and should not be tricked into this type of relationship. Educators take an oath that should be honored and one day Mr. Daniel just might have to deal with the pressure of protecting his children from just such "adults" as himself. Once again, I don't condone such behaviour and done wish this on any child. The few gives the majority a bad name.
scorpio21au
|
November 10, 2009
To Voter:

In response to your comment below:

"To the rude commenter below:

"You have no manners and your English is awful.

I would guess that you are a girl in high school (you act like one anyway) and that you do not have a clue what havoc a teacher/student affair can reek at a school, in a community and in the lives of the teacher and the student."

You bash a poster for their "awful English" and in your next paragraph use the word "reek" which means to "emit a stench" in place of the correct word "WREAK" which means " to inflict or exact".

As most of us that read the posts know, you are quick to point out other's flaws. At least don't commit the same "offenses" you blame others for doing. You see, everyone makes mistakes, even you.

iKnowIt
|
November 10, 2009
My guess is that the poster below is none other than Daniel's student lover. She showed up and posted on another local board taking up for the loser, too. Guess she'll figure it out when she has her own kid. The way things are looking, it won't be too long.
blahblahblah2009
|
November 10, 2009
i think its about time everyone gets a life around here and sticks to things that are their own business.. dont use the excuse "we have the right to know" & "its our kids future" those dont work here. Just grow up like the "mature adults" you call yourself and find something better and that personally involves you to talk about!

I HOPE no one on here calls themself a christian, because if you do-- might want to go read the Bible again.. Talks about FORGIVENESS & how NOT to cast stones unless you are free of sin.. which i highly highly doubt any of us are. Stop bashing a person who A- MADE A SIMPLE MISTAKE(not to mention, he still dates the girl so techically there is NOT an issue here and he didnt "use her") and he is suffering the consequences by NOT being able to use his degree anymore... and B-YOU DONT KNOW WHO HE IS AS A PERSON. the only people who should have a problem with this "court ruling" should be the families.. and its not, so shut up-grow up-and GET OVER IT! you cant change how the law is written.. and by law DANIEL BROWN did NOTHING WRONG! blame the ones who wrote the law, not the accused.. who didnt break the law at all. Make better use of your precious time then to follow around a news article and get excited because you have an open window to run your mouth and bash someone into the ground.. Try DOING YOUR JOB AT WORK OR TAKING CARE OF YOUR OWN FAMILY. AND STOP WORRYING ABOUT SOMEONE WHO HAS NO CONNECTION TO YOU!

by the way. Daniel will make an EXCELLENT father. The "fatherknowsbest" needs to think about his parenting skills first before assuming someone elses (whom doesnt even have a child..yet) what kind of things are you teaching your children? to be gossipers? just jump into things that dont involve them? and to not learn forgiveness...

innocent until proven guilty & daniel brown is innocent. END OF STORY!! THIS IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE. its over and done with.. DROP IT!.
Used2BARoman
|
November 10, 2009
First of all it amazes me that the very first comment made here brought racism into it. Maybe it shouldn't amaze me but it does. Second and most important is the letter by fatherknowsbest wishing this "teacher" should be so lucky as to have a 16 year old daughter and have the same happen to her. Both of these comments are way off track here. The LAST thing i want is for ANY child to have something like that happen to him / her NO MATTER WHAT COLOR they are.
fatherknowsbest
|
November 10, 2009
The greatest justice now for Daniel would be for him to father his own daughter and just know what he did and just know what "beasts" are out there and just know that some educator just might come along and have a consensual teacher-student relationship with his 16 year old. Just maybe he will be so lucky...
anonymous
|
November 10, 2009
Congrats Daniel, you got away with it. But, fortunately, we know what kind of "person" (used loosely) you are and we know to keep our kids away from you. You are forever a danger to society and the innocent. Shame on you for using your authority and position to exploit somebody. You will be used as an example now to thousands of children as who to keep away from. How do you live knowing the shame you have brought to yourself and your family?
Justcurious_1
|
November 10, 2009
How do you file statutory rape charges when the girls were 16 and 17 and the age of consent in GA is 16?
RomeWrecker
|
November 10, 2009
The state Supreme Court gives a crap, I suppose. Interestly enough, the parents of the girls involved could file statutory rape charges against the individuals, among other charges, but haven't.

I guess in this instance the girls really were "asking for it." Go figure.
anonymous
|
November 10, 2009
What a great day to be a WHITE child molester... Who gives a crap if it was consensual. It was a teacher and a underage teenage girl for God sakes...Sad
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.