Shorter University announces SACS reaccreditation
by Kim Sloan, staff writer
Dec 11, 2012 | 10433 views | 12 12 comments | 207 207 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Shorter University’s accreditation has been reaffirmed by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, according to SACS President Belle Wheelan.

The announcement was made Tuesday at the SACS Annual Conference in Dallas.

“We are pleased to have received a favorable report from SACS regarding our reaffirmation. I would like to commend the team involved with the reaffirmation process and thank them for their countless hours of work toward continuing our academic excellence in a Christ-centered environment,” said Shorter University President Donald Dowless, who is in Dallas at the conference, in a press release issued by school officials.

The reaffirmation continues Shorter University’s accreditation for a 10-year period through 2022.

SACS visited the university in April amidst protestors who were upset about the university’s Faith and Personal Lifestyle Statement, which faculty and staff members were required to sign.

During an interview in April, Wheelan said the statement of faith would not have any bearing on the school’s reaccreditation.

“They can do that. They’re a private college, and it’s part of their mission. Other colleges are doing the same thing,” Wheelan said. “Liberty (University in Virginia) has been doing that for a long time.”

More than 60 Shorter staff and faculty members resigned after the Board of Trustees passed a measure that required them to sign a Faith and Personal Lifestyle statement in which they agree, among other things, to “reject as acceptable all sexual activity not in agreement with the Bible, including, but not limited to, premarital sex, adultery and homosexuality.”

Two protests that included students, alumni and former faculty members were conducted after the university changes were announced.
Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Wren1
|
December 13, 2012
Do you really think a medical school should be all that interested in whether they believe in evolution or whether they are people of faith? Shouldn't they be good students of science (which you can learn about evolution but still not believe it 100% and believe in Intelligent Design?). I want a doctor who believes in the Creator God, who made good grades in the classroom and completed medical school successfully. I'm not sure what evolution matters and why any medical school would ask those questions. Is tolerance for another person's beliefs only to be exhibited by one side? Why does everyone have to toe the evolution line to get into medical school? I don't see that happening at the medical school here in our city--many fine Christian students are in med school here who do not believe in evolution.I do see evidence that there is prejudice against believers in the medical field. There was an uproar against Ben Carson being commencement speaker at Emory last year. We shouldn't shut people out because they are people of faith and a Christian lifestyle.
KingPellinore
|
December 13, 2012
Just curious; why do you specifically want a doctor who believes in a Creator God? Personally, I'd prefer to judge my doctor by his abilities over his faith.
Wren1
|
December 14, 2012
I guess because I don't want a doctor that thinks he is God. I don't just go to Christian doctors, but if I was facing serious illness or surgery, I would prefer a doctor who prayed to God to help him rather than one who just believed in himself and his own abilities.
Almost_Anonymous
|
December 13, 2012
Shorter's had a significant enrollment drop and has been losing money in the last year.

Hopefully, eliminating this uncertainty will turn those things around.
Almost_Anonymous
|
December 13, 2012
Any word yet on the issues with Shorter's nursing program's licensing issues? (Shorter's new staff's experience and training doesn't meet Georgia's regulations for nursing instruction programs).

Can they get a waiver from the state on their staff?

Nursing was an important and profitable program at Shorter before all those people bolted for Berry. I hope state regulations don't derail Dr. Dowless's attempts to keep it going.
Almost_Anonymous
|
December 13, 2012
The push is on in Georgia to get the state out of healthcare matters. I would think that backing off on nurse training regulations would be a natural candidate, especially if enough friends of Shorter and the GBC push the state to eliminate or relax these standards.

I wonder where Harbin, Floyd and Redmond stand on all this?
dbeall
|
December 12, 2012
Congratulations to Shorter University; a fine institution.
Savedandsanctified
|
December 12, 2012
What med schools will accept Shorter grads in four years when they ask the applicant about their B.S. degree program where Evolution is fake and the First Eleven Chapters of Genesis are History and Science.

As a matter of integrity it would seem to me Nelson Price should suggest all incoming Freshmen read Giberson and Stephens The Anointed and let them know flat out Shorter College does agree with the conclusions of these self professing Christians.

Also an introduction into the History and Legacy of the John Birch Society in NW Georgia should be taught in Shorter's Cultural History courses.



Just a few days ago I got in the mail the fall issue of the Furman Alumni Mag from my alma mater. You can read online at furman.edu/fumag a gutsy article on Furman 20 years after the Break with the S.C. Baptist Convention. As a former Historian for Furman and the South Carolina wrote me in Dec 1990 Furman went "cold Turkey" with the break.

The article has many quotes from Furman folks who went through that storm that saddened as they were by a break with a rich affiliating tradition, it was necessary for the vitality of the school.

Shorter has cast its sail with the Birch Society and the underbelly of the Tea Party. Will be interesting in 20 years to see their report on this travesty they have committed against the mind, and the best of the Baptist tradition.

P.S. Google Pierard, Franklin Graham, Frank Page and Richard Land at religiondispatches.org for an indicator of how the 2032 report on Shorter will most likely look like.
jwagdoc
|
December 12, 2012
Not surprising. Anyone who understood the process knew that their accreditation wasn't in jeopardy. Just wishful thinking by those opposed to the changes being made.
dautry
|
December 13, 2012
Totally agree with jwagdoc. Congratulations Shorter. Press on.
Wren1
|
December 11, 2012
Congratulations Shorter. Thanks for actually enforcing the Faculty Handbook and taking a strong interest in the lifestyle of those who teach at Shorter. I wish it had happened years ago but at least it has happened now.
Almost_Anonymous
|
December 11, 2012
This is wonderful news. Shorter stays accredited!

Big relief for everyone.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.