Rome looks for resolution to 411 project
by Doug Walker, Associate Editor
Jun 15, 2012 | 3164 views | 7 7 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Fish, or cut bait? That was essentially the question put to members of the Rome-Floyd Development Authority on Thursday morning regarding the preferred route for the U.S. 411 Connector to Interstate 75.

“How long are we going to continue to fight this battle?” asked authority treasurer Otis Raybon, publisher of the Rome News-Tribune.

The Rollins family in Cartersville, whose ranch would be bisected by the project, has shown no indication that it will stop fighting the project with every dollar in their checkbook.

Authority Chairwoman Angie Lewis summed up the response to the question by indicating the Department of Transportation needs to get several issues resolved to move forward, likely prompting another lawsuit from the Rollins camp.

“This is the compromise,” Chamber President Al Hodge reminded the authority of the current preferred route. Route D-VE was developed after many years of environmental and traffic safety studies that involved at least 17 public hearings.

“Gov. Nathan Deal, Congressman Phil Gingrey, Sens. Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss have all endorsed D-VE,” Hodge said. “One of our concerns is that any other change to the route will take another seven years,” Hodge said.

“They’ve got more engineers and lawyers than we do,” said authority member Pete McDonald, adding that the Rollins family has shown a willingness to drag the fight out however long it takes.

Lewis said several remaining issues should be resolved this summer, including a decision from the National Historical Register as to whether or not the Dobbins Mountain Mine is in fact a historical property. Lewis said that even if it is, the state is prepared to show it is still in the best interest of the state that the route not be changed.

Another issue remains the city of Euharlee’s conservation easement across the route, which was acquired after the federal record of decision delineating the proposed route had been established. Hodge said that if the easement is upheld as a legal impediment to the project, it could set precedent that could block road projects all over the country.

In other news, Hodge told the authority that the chamber has been extraordinarily busy.

“There are a lot of projects in the pipeline,” Hodge said. “We are marketing buildings, including the other half of the Mohawk distribution building and the Florida Tile building on Highway 53. We are also marketing land as fortunately we do have several places for prospective industries to look at.”

Diane Lewis, chairwoman of the Greater Rome Existing Industries Association, said the jobs event hosted by GREIA and the chamber recently was a huge success.

“Not just for filling current employment positions, but also really for building a pipeline (for future openings),” Lewis said.

Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
RW.Hardin
|
June 18, 2012
I want to see those of who are calling for eminent domain to be used give up your private property for the "good" of the community. I want to see you people stand to the side and just accept it as someone takes something that you worked for right out of your hands. That's what eminent domain is.
RW.Hardin
|
June 18, 2012
those who*
richardcranium
|
June 15, 2012
The way I understand it, if the State exerts it's right to eminent domain, the fighting is over. A reasonable price is paid for the land and development can commence.

I have to wonder why there has been no mention in the press of the State choosing to use it's rights in this matter.

What are we waiting for?
Icarus10
|
June 15, 2012
Its eminent domain.
PhilHenry
|
June 15, 2012
Those of you citing imminent domain have obviously not been following the story. It is a given that the land will have to be taken through that process. The question is how much money the state will have to spend to fight the Rollins family in court over the route. As the article stated, the Rollins family appears to be willing to spend whatever it takes to stop the road from crossing their land.
themorrigan
|
June 15, 2012
You CAN fight City Hall. Fighting the 1 Percent is a little harder.

For that, you NEED City Hall.
AnotherPatriot
|
June 15, 2012
Uh...the answer to this is easy...it's called "eminant domain".
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.