Chicago teachers strike for first time in 25 years
by DON BABWIN and TAMMY WEBBER,Associated Press
Sep 10, 2012 | 2949 views | 15 15 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Chicago teachers walk a picket line outside Benjamin Banneker Elementary School in Chicago, Monday, Sept. 10, 2012, after they went on strike for the first time in 25 years. Union and district officials failed to reach a contract agreement despite intense weekend negotiations. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)
Chicago teachers walk a picket line outside Benjamin Banneker Elementary School in Chicago, Monday, Sept. 10, 2012, after they went on strike for the first time in 25 years. Union and district officials failed to reach a contract agreement despite intense weekend negotiations. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)
slideshow
CHICAGO (AP) — Thousands of teachers walked off the job Monday in Chicago's first schools strike in 25 years, after union leaders announced that months-long negotiations had failed to resolve a contract dispute with school district officials by a midnight deadline.

The walkout in the nation's third-largest school district posed a tricky challenge for the city and Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who said he would push to end the strike quickly as officials figure out how to keep nearly 400,000 children safe and occupied.

"This is not a strike I wanted," Emanuel said Sunday night, not long after the union announced the action. "It was a strike of choice ... it's unnecessary, it's avoidable and it's wrong."

Some 26,000 teachers and support staff were expected to join the picket. Among teachers protesting Monday morning outside Benjamin Banneker Elementary School on Chicago's South Side, eighth-grade teacher Michael Williams said he wanted a quick contract resolution.

"We hoped that it wouldn't happen. We all want to get back to teaching," Williams said, adding that wages and classroom conditions need to be improved.

Contract negotiations between Chicago Public School officials and union leaders that stretched through the weekend were expected to resume Monday.

Officials said some 140 schools would be open between 8:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. so the children who rely on free meals provided by the school district can eat breakfast and lunch, school district officials said.

City officials acknowledged that children left unsupervised — especially in neighborhoods with a history of gang violence — might be at risk, but vowed to protect the students' safety.

"We will make sure our kids are safe, we will see our way through these issues and our kids will be back in the classroom where they belong," said Emanuel, President Barack Obama's former chief of staff.

The school district asked community organizations to provide additional programs for students, and a number of churches, libraries and other groups plan to offer day camps and other activities.

Police Chief Garry McCarthy said he would take officers off desk duty and deploy them to deal with any teachers' protests as well as the thousands of students who could be roaming the streets.

Union leaders and district officials were not far apart in their negotiations on compensation, Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis said. But other issues — including potential changes to health benefits and a new teacher evaluation system based partly on students' standardized test scores — remained unresolved, she said.

"This is a difficult decision and one we hoped we could have avoided," Lewis said. "We must do things differently in this city if we are to provide our students with the education they so rightfully deserve."

Before the strike, some parents said they would not drop their children at strange schools where they didn't know the other students or supervising adults. On Monday, as only a trickle of students arrived at some schools, April Logan said she wouldn't leave her daughter with an adult she didn't know. Her daughter, Ashanti, started school just a week earlier.

"I don't understand this, my baby just got into school," Logan said at Benjamin Mays Academy on the city's South Side before turning around and taking her daughter home.

Some students expressed anger, blaming the school district for interrupting their education.

"They're not hurting the teachers, they're hurting us," said Ta'Shara Edwards, a 16-year-old student at Robeson High School on the city's South Side. She said her mother made her come to class to do homework because so she "wouldn't suck up her light bill."

But there was anger toward teachers, as well.

"I think it's crazy. Why are they even going on strike?" asked Ebony Irvin, a 17-year-old student at Robeson.

Emanuel and the union officials have much at stake. Unions and collective bargaining by public employees have recently come under criticism in many parts of the country, and all sides are closely monitoring who might emerge with the upper hand in the Chicago dispute.

The timing also may be inopportune for Emanuel, whose city administration is wrestling with a spike in murders and shootings in some city neighborhoods and who just agreed to take a larger role in fundraising for Obama's re-election campaign.

As the strike deadline approached, parents spent Sunday worrying about how much their children's education might suffer and where their kids will go while they're at work.

"They're going to lose learning time," said Beatriz Fierro, whose daughter is in the fifth grade on the city's Southwest Side. "And if the whole afternoon they're going to be free, it's bad. Of course you're worried."

The school board was offering a fair and responsible contract that would most of the union's demands after "extraordinarily difficult" talks, board president David Vitale said. Emanuel said the district offered the teachers a 16 percent pay raise over four years, doubling an earlier offer.

Lewis said among the issues of concern was a new evaluation that she said would be unfair to teachers because it relied too heavily on students' standardized test scores and does not take into account external factors that affect performance, including poverty, violence and homelessness.

She said the evaluations could result in 6,000 teachers losing their jobs within two years. City officials disagreed and said the union has not explained how it reached that conclusion.

Emanuel said the evaluation would not count in the first year, as teachers and administrators worked out any kinks. Schools CEO Jean-Claude Brizard said the evaluation "was not developed to be a hammer," but to help teachers improve.

The strike is the latest flashpoint in a very public and often contentious battle between the mayor and the union.

When he took office last year, Emanuel inherited a school district facing a $700 million budget shortfall. Not long after, his administration rescinded 4 percent raises for teachers. He then asked the union to reopen its contract and accept 2 percent pay raises in exchange for lengthening the school day for students by 90 minutes. The union refused.

Emanuel, who promised a longer school day during his campaign, then attempted to go around the union by asking teachers at individual schools to waive the contract and add 90 minutes to the day. He halted the effort after being challenged by the union before the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board.

The district and union agreed in July on how to implement the longer school day, striking a deal to hire back 477 teachers who had been laid off rather than pay regular teachers more to work longer hours. That raised hopes the contract dispute would be settled soon, but bargaining continued on the other issues.

___

Associated Press Writer Sophia Tareen contributed to this report.
Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
LiedToAgainAndAgain
|
September 13, 2012


Here are the following 10 reasons why we should vote for Obama.....

1. Just because we're Union Extortionists and Overpaid Union thugs.

2. Just because we're black.

3. Just because we're atheists who get our kicks out of booing God at our convention.

4. Just because most of those at our family reunions are illegal aliens.

5. Just because we don't have any children because we aborted them years ago.

6. Just because we support pornography, obscenity on TV, and use profane language.

7. Just because we love our weed!.....and crack!.....and meth!

8. Just because we're against traditional marriage and support "anything goes, bro!"

9. Just because we're kids in college, and will believe anything from a dude on MTV!

10. And...last...Just because we're simple minded and easily led by the Pied Piper of Chicago.
LiedToAgainAndAgain
|
September 12, 2012
Why do Chicago's schools do so poorly? Same reason why schools in ALL of our largest cities do poorly...the inner city black culture.

First off, this has nothing to do with racism. It deals with FACTS. We have a culture issue today whereby the black "family" has ceased to exist. 70% of all black babies are now being born out of wedlock. That's 70%, and that's a fact. What do you expect when you have huge numbers of children who no longer have the standard family structure that other American's have to enjoy?

Kids NEED a mom and dad...a home...a caring two person family. But what we have today is a black ghetto culture that has run amok.

Chicago has 300 plus murders each year, basically black on black crime. Democrats herded blacks into these inner city housing ghettos years ago in an attempt to control and manipulate blacks under the guise of helping the black family. All of this black manipulation by the Democrats has been met with failure. The only success has been with the Democrats continued control and manipulation of blacks for their vote. A new type of slavery/sharecropping is now going on, with the masters of the plantation now being the Democratic Party and its leaders instead.

These inner city schools are both zoos and war zones, with violent gangs in control of things.

Shootings, beatings, robbery and violence is now a fact of life in the hood. Any teacher willing to work in such an environment is more than worthy of receiving combat pay.
anabelle_lee
|
September 11, 2012
The solution is school choice and vouchers. Teachers want parent involvement but they don't want their input to go so far as to be able to take their money with them and move to another school.

Anyone who is able should homeschool. If your child learns anything, you practically have to do that anyway in the form of teaching them everything over again when they get home because the teacher just assigned them busywork and didn't explain it. (note to grammar police: I know that's a runon but when tried to fix it, it tried to delete the whole thing)
TheSeer
|
September 11, 2012
The solution to this strike should be the one that Ronald Reagan applied to air traffic controllers and that should be used in every strike. Give the teachers 24 hours to return to work. Fire every teacher who doesn't return to work, hire replacements and ban those striking teachers from the classroom for 10 years. If that teacher doesn't want to work, I as a parent don't want them. There are too many qualified people looking for jobs in this country to put up with whining malcontents who don't want to come to work.
FormerRoman
|
September 11, 2012
well stated seer.
snapshots
|
September 13, 2012
Agreed. Private unions are balanced by the bottom line of the business. Public unions are thugs demanding tax dollars with nothing to balance the other side.
3isEnough
|
September 10, 2012
The problem is not the paycheck. Those kids are rough, and you need good tough teachers. The problem is the 70 cents on the dollar going to the retired teachers! Only 30 cents on the education dollar is going to todays' classroom. The next problem is teachers who make excuses why they cannot reach an inner city child. Basically, the teachers are saying they cannot teach these children but because the children are so 'un-teachable', and these teachers deserve to keep their job because the problem is the child and not the teacher. Try the blame-game excuse in private business and see how long you keep your job.
Enforcer
|
September 11, 2012
Its typical in Chicago to blame everyone else. It's the Obama way.
acct101
|
September 10, 2012
As stated in the article, the Union also took issue with a new teacher evaluation process that relied heavily on student’s standardized test and not enough on environment factors (poverty, violence, homelessness). I guess they have cause to worry. Latest (2011) US Dept of Ed study shows that 79 percent of Chicago’s public school 8th graders are not grade level proficient in reading and 80 percent are not grade level proficient in math.
MaxPower
|
September 10, 2012
KingPell



The avg pay is 71 K Divided by 190 work days, That's not including benefits .
TheSeer
|
September 10, 2012
One of the issues in Chicago is the length of the school day. Students in Chicago only go to school 5 and a half hours a day--Thr shortest school day anywhere in the country. Rahm Emmanuel wants to add 90 minutes to the day to bring tym in line with everyone else. The starting salary for a teacher with a bachelor's degree and no experience is $59,000 a year. There are plenty of laid off qualified teachers who can fill those Chicago jobs if they don't want them.
YIKES!!
|
September 10, 2012
thats unions for ya.....

They had a time and place but no longer.
MaxPower
|
September 10, 2012
Wow !!

The Teachers in Chicago make over $375 a day. And there not happy ? Fire them All !!
KingPellinore
|
September 10, 2012
That's almost $100,000 a year.

I hate to doubt your facts, but I don't know any public school teachers that make that kind of money.
ElephantWhip
|
September 10, 2012
Actually Max might be right on the hourly rate. What he is probably missing are the details. Teachers generally work 190 day contracts. And he is probably using their max salary after 20 years of service. Factor that in and it comes out to about $70 K a year. I bet that's the maximum salary for non-administrative teachers without graduate school degrees who have worked over 20 years.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.