Acquitted Rec Authority employee Armstrong files intent to sue
by Kim Sloan, Staff Writer
Sep 22, 2012 | 9228 views | 7 7 comments | 32 32 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A former employee of the Rome-Floyd Parks and Recreation Authority acquitted of stealing money has filed a notice to sue the city of Rome, the recreation authority, Floyd County and RFPRA Director Richard Garland.

Karen Armstrong is claiming false arrest and wrongful abusive prosecution.

The former gymnastics instructor was arrested in March 2010 on theft charges and acquitted on March 24 of this year in Floyd County Superior Court.

In the document sent to the city, county and recreation authority officials, Armstrong said there was no written policy that prohibited Armstrong from collecting money personally for uniforms and paying it out of her personal account.

The investigation began when Garland received a call from a parent who was concerned about giving money to Armstrong personally, Garland said in an interview in March.

Garland contacted the Rome Police Department, which began an investigation.

Armstrong eventually resigned, giving Garland $4,300 and information as to who had given the money. She was not taking any of that money for her personal use, she said, but to pay for the items for the young gymnasts.

“There wasn’t a dime that was not accounted for,” said Steve Lanier, Armstrong’s attorney, in March.

But that didn’t matter, Garland said, who also questioned if all the money was recovered. 

“It’s not a case of whether or not she spent the money on leotards or warm-ups,” he said in a previous interview. “There was cash that never made it to the authority. There should have never been any parental involvement.”

Armstrong said she had the support of the parents, many who testified for her in her trial.

She is asking for damages as a result of her arrest of about $88,500 and an amount not less than $1 million for pain and suffering.

“The humiliation and embarrassment of being falsely accused forced me to stay in my home and not go out in public for months,” Arm­strong said in the notice. “After years of successful coaching and never being accused of any wrong doing, my reputation and good name was ruined in both my personal and professional life.”

Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
shameonrfpra
|
September 28, 2012
Richard Garland leads the employee's of the rec by intimidation and threats. Everyone there despises Garland and has NO respect for him. The way he talks about people and the language he uses about them behind their backs is disgusting. He has no business being in a position like he is in and the rec board should be ashamed to let him continue being the director of rec.
shannonres
|
September 25, 2012
Obvious that romemom33 has never worked for him. Or seen him "work." In fact, even those who have worked around him have never seem him work. He purposefully and willfully destroyed someone's well being over jealousy over her successes. The only reason the city or county will never get rid of him is he was their info source for the false information that ultimately sent Bob Saylors out.
fairminded
|
September 25, 2012
By suing the City and County, does that mean the tax payers are responsible for paying her if she wins? If so, why should the burden fall on the public for the bad situation she put herself in?
Watchingit
|
September 25, 2012
What our tax money pays for are the insurance premiums covering such lawsuit payouts.
fairminded
|
September 27, 2012
So, if a payout is made in this frivolous suit, the public still suffers by having to pay increased premiums in the future.
romemom33
|
September 24, 2012
tnsguy, you have no clue, or even a hint of the real story. Richard Garland is a great man and makes the RFPRA work for the citizens of Floyd County. What do you do? Do you have to manage anything besides your cholesterol? Get a life.

People like you are the reason lawyers make money.
Tnsguy
|
September 24, 2012
Richard is Bob Saylors in a younger bigger body. I feel sorry for Floyd County!
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.