High court questions Texas affirmative action plan
by MARK SHERMAN,Associated Press
Oct 10, 2012 | 967 views | 1 1 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Abigail Fisher, the Texan involved in the University of Texas affirmative action case, accompanied by her attorney Bert Rein, right, talks to reporters outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012. The Supreme Court is taking up a challenge to a University of Texas program that considers race in some college admissions. The case could produce new limits on affirmative action at universities, or roll it back entirely. The University of Texas at Austin President Bill Powers is at right.(AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Abigail Fisher, the Texan involved in the University of Texas affirmative action case, accompanied by her attorney Bert Rein, right, talks to reporters outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012. The Supreme Court is taking up a challenge to a University of Texas program that considers race in some college admissions. The case could produce new limits on affirmative action at universities, or roll it back entirely. The University of Texas at Austin President Bill Powers is at right.(AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
slideshow
WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court justices sharply questioned the University of Texas' use of race in college admissions Wednesday in a case that could lead to new limits on affirmative action.

The court heard arguments in a challenge to the program from a white Texan who contends she was discriminated against when the university did not offer her a spot in 2008.

The court's conservatives cast doubt on the program that uses race as one among many factors in admitting about a quarter of the university's incoming freshmen.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vote could be decisive, looked skeptically on Texas' defense of the program. "What you're saying is what counts is race above all," Kennedy said.

Twenty-two-year-old Abigail Fisher was among the hundreds of spectators at the arguments. Also in attendance was retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who wrote the majority opinion in a 2003 case that upheld the use of race in college admissions.

Justice Samuel Alito, O'Connor's successor, has voted consistently against racial preferences since he joined the court in 2006 and appears likely to side with Fisher.

Among the liberal justices who looked more favorably on the Texas admissions system was Justice Sonia Sotomayor. She told Bert Rein, Fisher's Washington-based lawyer, that he was looking to "gut" the nine-year-old decision.

The federal appeals court in New Orleans upheld the Texas program, saying it was consistent with the 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger.

Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Antonin Scalia and Alito raised repeated objections to the affirmative action plan.

Roberts wanted to know how the university would determine when it had a "critical mass" of diversity on campus that would allow it to end the program.

Near the end of the session, he complained, "I'm hearing a lot about what it's not. I would like to know what it is."

The university says the program is necessary to provide the kind of diverse educational experience the high court has previously endorsed. The rest of its slots go to students who are admitted based on their high school class rank, without regard to race

Opponents of the program say the university is practicing illegal discrimination by considering race at all, especially since it achieves significant diversity through its race-blind admissions.

After the argument concluded, Fisher read a brief statement outside in which she said she hoped the court would rule that race or ethnicity "should not be considered when applying to the University of Texas."

Justice Elena Kagan is not taking part in the case, probably because she worked on it at the Justice Department before joining the court.

___

Associated Press writer Jesse J. Holland contributed to this report.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
roberty-tx
|
October 10, 2012
I am an Asian-American. I graduated from UC Berkeley, which does not have AA and subsequently is 44% Asian (Source: http://berkeley.edu/about/fact.shtml), and I am a CPA. Let me tell you, because I am not Black or Hispanic, no one has given me any preferential treatment.

But also let me tell you that there is plenty of discrimination out there. I've experienced it at most companies where I have worked. Usually it is subtle; sometimes it is overt. I'm not asking for a handout or preferential treatment; I am simply stating a fact.

I am writing because we live in Round Rock, TX. We sent our kids to Kumon and they go to Westwood, one of the top high schools in the area. My older son got into the university of his choice because he graduated with a 4.0 GPA (on a 5.0 scale). My second son is probably not going to. We all know that my second son will probably lose his spot to a less qualified Black or Hispanic, but we don't whine about it. I tell him that he should have studied harder.

I also know that if one of my kids had ever gone missing, we would be at a disadvantage because their disappearance would not receive the kind of media attention that is given to White victims. Oh well.

So I find it rather amusing to see some Whites playing the "victim card" because, from where I'm standing, Whites in this country have been dealt a pretty good hand.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.