NAIA plans to take title football game out of Rome after 2013 clash
by Diane Wagner, staff writer
Oct 18, 2012 | 16554 views | 30 30 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A sign on U.S. 411 at the bypass touts Rome as the “Home of the NAIA National Football Championship Game.” (Diane Wagner / Rome News-Tribune)
A sign on U.S. 411 at the bypass touts Rome as the “Home of the NAIA National Football Championship Game.” (Diane Wagner / Rome News-Tribune)
slideshow
The NAIA and the Rome Host Committee have agreed to changes in the contract that names Rome as the host site for the NAIA Football National Championship.

Rome has been home to the championship since 2008 and in 2010 was awarded a contract to host the game through 2015. As plans were being made for the 2012 game, the NAIA approached the Rome Host Committee asking to end the current agreement after the 2013 championship game.

“Since that conversation, we have been talking with our partners – the City of Rome, Floyd County, Shorter University, and the Greater Rome Convention and Visitors Bureau,” said Host Committee Co-Chair Bob Berry. “We realized that this championship relationship wouldn’t work well if we aren’t in full partnership. When we first bid on this game in 2007, Rome had two NAIA schools. Since that time, both Shorter and Berry have moved into the NCAA, and the NAIA has expressed an interest in moving the game to an NAIA site. While we were disappointed in that decision, we certainly understand their point of view and have agreed to the change in contract terms.”

The NAIA has posted a call for bids to host the championship on its Website. Bids are due next summer and will include hosting the 2014 and 2015 championship games.

Berry added that, while the contract term has been shortened, Rome will continue to serve as the host site for two additional games. “The NAIA championship has generated a lot of economic impact over the past four years. We essentially still have one-third of the contract term ahead of us. The host committee understands that we should take every opportunity to continue to put on a successful event.

“Finishing strong is important as we continue to build the sports resume of our community. While the NAIA contract is ending early, the change allows us to put ourselves in a position to bid on other events.”

Over the past four years, Berry added, the championship game has generated more than $6 million in economic impact for the Greater Rome community. It is estimated that another $3.5 million will be generated over the next two years, resulting in a total financial boost of almost $10 million during a very difficult economic time.

“In addition to a substantial boost to the local economy, the change in the area in and around West Third Street has been incredible,” Berry said. “The championship game has been a win-win for the community, for Rome-Floyd Parks and Recreation Authority, Rome High School, Shorter University, and for everyone else who utilizes Barron Stadium.”

Berry added that the host committee continues to move forward with enthusiasm about hosting both the 2012 and 2013 championship games. “Rome, Ga., will continue to return to the national stage for these two championship games,” he said, “and we encourage the community to support the championships. We are actively seeking sponsors, and tickets will be on sale later this month. We want to do an outstanding job of hosting this event and showcase the incredible hospitality of our community.”

The 2012 championship will be played on Thursday, Dec. 13, with kickoff slated for 6:30 p.m.

For a schedule of events for the 2012 championship game, visit www.NAIANationalChampionship.com.
Comments
(30)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
romegeorgiaman
|
January 06, 2013
and exactly how many times ''soccer players were complained about by stadium officials to the police department to have them removed.? more times than i can count... yet these soccer players are taxpayers also...but they went along and left without incident, peacefully... if they had raised cain.. perhaps it would have been a start to citizens against the wasteful local government...
Trelicious
|
October 20, 2012
I predict in the next month that some release is made that the JJRA championship is considering coming here and that the expected economic impact is 3 trillion dollars according to the Chamber. TheSeer will come on and tell us "Ha!", and then everything will continue as usual.
Prossarian
|
October 19, 2012
Did anybody really think this game would ever stay in Rome, Georgia? To make our local politicians understand anything it takes a huge stand by the citizens. The citizens here rarely make a stand. It wouldn't surprise me if this property ends up in Doss' hands in the long run and the place is torn down and moved to the Armuchee Bypass...

Historic Barron Stadium? What's historic about it?
sunflower63
|
October 18, 2012
And another golden goose bites the dust . . . Not that anybody is surprised !!! After the taxpayers poured out all their hard earned money to "remodel" the stadium for this one ball game, one time a year. (But how soon some have forgotten, the original plan was to tear down the stadium in the "West Third" project.) Then, the NAIA game "saved" the stadium from the bulldozers, but we had "fix it up" to get the contract. Spend money to make money !

One football game, one time a year, ALL the money it will bring to Rome. When did your NAIA revenue check come ? Mine must have gotten lost in the mail.
Mark7seven
|
October 18, 2012
Building venues for sports(or the arts) is not a valid function of government. We should be letting private individuals or business entities bear the cost of building and running them. That way when things like this happen the taxpayers aren't the ones left holding the bag.

When will voters learn? I think never.
Tac1333
|
October 18, 2012
The reason we let them out is because hopefully we can pick up some of the playoff games for the NCAA which is a bigger organization. Yes Shorter screw us again because they were the only School with a NAIA football team. So I think personally Shorter should have to pay the city back for part of the 3.5 million. I mean really how much Money has Shorter cost Rome with all the crap they have been pulling. From professors leaving to students deciding to go to another school. I guarantee it is way more than the 3.5 million. Some one do a economic impact study on how much money Shorter has cost this county over this stupid unconstitutional contract that they made people sign.

Now the city needs to go after getting us some NCAA play off or Championship games. But come on people that are looks so much better so I am going to say it was worth the splost to clean up our great city.

Why do you people always see the negative and have such a hard time seeing the positives about life and things that happen. oh Well this is just my two cents. .
Tac1333
|
October 18, 2012
Sorry that area look so much better

I don't know how

"That are looks so much better". Came from
dbeall
|
October 18, 2012
Exactly how do you guarantee that number? Secondly, you have a right to your opinion, but explain how Shorter, a private business, is violating the Constitution by entering into a contract with its employees in which they stipulate conditions of employment, which the employee is free to accept or deny? Is there an article in the US Constitution which guarantees the right to work at Shorter University?
Tac1333
|
October 19, 2012
If I was to write a contract and make all my employees sign it that stated: you can not participate in religious activities while employed here. If you do you will be fired. Or we are going to become a vegetarian company so even if you have worked here for 20 years you are not allowed to eat meat or we will terminate you. It is discrimination no matter how you say it. It is no different than what America use to do to African Americans. I can go on and on but then you will have a answer to why it is ok for Shorter to essentially be a raciest institution. Either way we will agree to disagree.
dbeall
|
October 19, 2012
Actually, it's much different than what America used to do to blacks. By the way, that has been over for quite some time now, so can we give that a rest already. Cite the Article and section of the US Constitution that Shorter is violating. That was your claim.
Almost_Anonymous
|
October 25, 2012
I don't see how Shorter can come up with the money you want them to "pay back." They're rapidly going broke with big declines in both their on-campus and off-campus programs.

More importantly, I don't see how they have any obligation here unless they made some financial commitment that hasn't been publicized. They were NAIA members and they helped the City land a good opportunity. Later, they did what they thought was best for their school -- they moved from the NAIA to the NCAA. I don't think they had any obligation to stay in the NAIA just to help the City cover its risks.

I appreciate Shorter's presence in the community. I'm sorry about all the troubles they're going through and I hope they can survive.

The SaveOurShorter.com site just posted some very bleak enrollment numbers; I'm hoping the RN-T will follow up. Hopefully those numbers are wrong!
chieftrojan
|
October 18, 2012
So the championship game is leaving, and Shorter is to blame because they decided to leave the NAIA (just like Berry did a few years ago). Please tell me what sense this makes to blame a school for moving with the times. They've outgrown the NAIA, and you want them to stay because of the championship game? All football championships are hosted in a city with a member a part of the association. It's common sense to have the NAIA championship at a NAIA town.

Surely they can, and probably will, bid for other games. That stadium is gorgeous and will bring in people. But every time the stadium, the track, or the school are mentioned, it's as if you forget the positive things, that all three have done for the community. Clearly I'm not speaking about the comments here that are positive. Everyone has their right to say whatever they like. However, I can't help but notice it's the same people, covering the same topics.
hellorome
|
October 25, 2012


chieftrojan

"All football championships are hosted in a city with a member a part of the association."



Really SEC Championship Atlanta GA = No SEC team there.

ACC Championship Charlotte NC = No ACC team there.

Big Ten Championship Indianapolis IN = No Big 10 teams there.

And the Big 12 when they had one was never hosted in a town with a team from the Big 12 in it.

jstsayn
|
October 17, 2012
Rome City Commissioners need to apologize to the tax payers for fumbling the ball. Then they need to explain how the bills will be paid without this "million dollar game". Maybe their new tennis center will bail them out. Just like the golf course has helped them pay the bills.
dbeall
|
October 17, 2012
It seems some of us have no other hobby besides complaining.
Trelicious
|
October 17, 2012
Sometimes, I agree with you. But it doesn't do away with the question "If it makes 3.5 million per visit, why are we giving it up for two years that we were contractually guaranteed? Because one party was unhappy with the arrangement? Well duh, that's why we have contracts."

It also doesn't do away with the fact that the "perpetuity of the cash-cow NAIA game" was one of the pipe dreams sold to us when pushing the SPLOST for the 3 million dollar football field/track. You know that SPLOST that gets brought up every time someone mentions SPLOST, as an example of SPLOST waste that came before the SPLOST for police cars and dump trucks (those are luxuries, unlike astroturf and running tracks).

In conclusion, complaints are called for in this situation.
dbeall
|
October 17, 2012
Yet the stadium is still used for both Shorter University and Rome High. I am not one to support most taxes, but if you're going to implement a tax, a SPLOST is ideal because out of town visitors help pay it. And how much does a SPLOST really cost each person? 1 dollar on every hundred? Not much to complain about.
Trelicious
|
October 17, 2012
The complaint is that they pushed astroturf and running track (and tied it to a public safety project) and then came back later asking for necessities. They got smacked down too.
commonsense2
|
October 17, 2012
The press release says...

"Over the past four years, Berry added, the championship game has generated

more than $6 million in economic impact for the Greater Rome community. It

is estimated that another $3.5 million will be generated over the next two

years, resulting in a total financial boost of almost $10 million during a

very difficult economic time."

So basicaally what Mr Berry is saying is the revenue generated over a two year period is 3.5 million dollars. We are giving NAIA two years back. So we are handing 3.5 million dollars to another city even though we have a legally binding contract that says they HAVE to have the game in Rome?! What is the purpose of a contract? Rome businesses NEED 3.5 million dollars! This is a disapointment to say the least.

Trelicious
|
October 17, 2012
Good point common sense. I doubt this city has negotiators that would even reach the level of mediocre.
Icarus10
|
October 17, 2012
This has been great for Rome, I hope it stays.
jet61
|
October 17, 2012
So now can we "taxpayers" have all the money back that you spent "upgrading" Barron Stadium for the NAIA?

Also, all the hours that we "taxpayers" were not able to use the track because it was closed for renovations or repairs? Really? Who is in charge of all this wasted money? From what I saw, nobody in Rome was remotely interested in this game to start with. Now that it is on a Thursday night, (school night), it will be even less attended, so all those $$$$ you think that you are going to make---NOT! Shorter definitely doesn't need it because they don't even have but a few students any more. All the quality football players have transferred to a "real" football University.
AncientRoman
|
October 17, 2012
Something else for which Rome can thank Shorter.
jarnoldcr
|
October 17, 2012
Shouldn't you also thank Berry?
AncientRoman
|
October 17, 2012
Berry never had a NAIA football team, nor did they use it to sell a SPLOST progam just to have a stadium they could rent more cheaply than building their own. Berry will build their own stadium, track and athletic facility, and do it on their own campus with money from their own supporters.
jarnoldcr
|
October 17, 2012
When we first bid on this game in 2007, Rome had two NAIA schools. Since that time, both Shorter and Berry have moved into the NCAA, and the NAIA has expressed an interest in moving the game to an NAIA site.
romanempire
|
October 18, 2012
Soooo - Berry didn't have a football team - AND announced it was moving to NCAA DIII BEFORE the SPLOST and before the current contract for the Championship game was negotiated - and you think Berry shares some blame for this?NAIA knew they were moving before current contract and, if memory serves they did not play any part in Championship negotiations at any point, were never asked to play any role in hosting, and were never a part of the reason Shorter or City pushed this..... Nice try Arnold.

I don't think you really can blame Shorter either unless you somehow think they "owed" it to City and taxpayers to wait at least until promised 6 years of games had run (quote from City Mgr. at the time in RNT) - either way has nothing to do with Berry.

No matter how much you want to blame others - doesn't make it true.
TheSeer
|
October 17, 2012
If you have a 10 year contract, why let the other party out of the agreement after eight years?
tman61
|
October 18, 2012
I have bid on large events many times. In spite of the contract if you are not reasonable with the partner you signed the contract with you have burned a bridge that will come back to haunt you. I am sure Rome plans to bid on other football events in the future. A record as an unreasonable partner will preclude that. It would kill any possibility of other events. Their is no way either party could have foreseen both Shorter and Berry leaving NAIA. The dealmaking on this stuff is too complex for many on this site to comprehend. THese people have to think 25 years out, not two years out.
Trelicious
|
October 17, 2012
And.......Boom goes the dynamite.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.