Rome chickens get a reprieve, City Commission approves suspensions of the alcohol pouring licenses at 3 local restaurants
by Diane Wagner, staff writer
Oct 23, 2012 | 10270 views | 19 19 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Chicken Issue City Commission Meeting
People stand in support of the Lewis family and their chickens during city commision meeting at city hall on Oct. 22, 2012. (AJ Pierce/RN-T)
view slideshow (5 images)
A local family will be able to keep their pet chickens — at least until the Rome City Commission figures out what it wants to do about the issue.

Commissioners voted 6-2 on Monday to table action on a request from Chris and Erin Lewis for a special use permit to continue keeping four hens at their Fair Oaks subdivision home.

The motion also referred the issue back to the Rome-Floyd Planning Commission for a set of recommended conditions on any urban poultry permit.

It also put a moratorium on accepting new applications and allowed the Lewises to keep their birds until the question is resolved.

“It’s a thing that’s not going away. It’s a trend. It’s something people want to do,” Commissioner Kim Canada said during a caucus discussion. “I think we need to set some rules and conditions that we as a community are willing to live with.”

The commission has twice rejected an ordinance that would have allowed and regulated urban poultry-keeping.

Canada said he’d rather track the activity by having individuals apply for special use permits that contain strict conditions. His four-part motion was supported by Commissioners Milton Slack III, Jamie Doss, Sue Lee, Detrick Redding and Bill Collins.

Commissioners Buzz Wachsteter and Bill Irmscher were opposed. Irmscher said a majority of residents he polled don’t want chickens in their neighbors’ yards. Wach­steter objected to the provision that exempts the Lewises’ hens.

“I think (the issue) needs further study, but I don’t understand how we can suspend enforcement of the law for one family,” Wachsteter said.

Officials publicly stated they’re aware residents keep urban poultry, but the prohibition isn’t enforced unless there’s a complaint. The Lewises had theirs for about three years, for eggs and as teaching tools for their young homeschooled daughters, until an elderly and ailing neighbor complained.

The woman’s daughter, Regina Bishop, said she didn’t mind temporary amnesty for the Lewises’ flock as long as tougher regulations would be crafted.

She brought about a dozen backers, some of whom testified about the potential for disease and loss of property values. Paul Peterson said Rome “should be embarrassed” to have urban poultry like a third-world country.

“We have to make a decision if we want to be a city that does not allow farm animals in its environs” or let them run loose, Peterson said.

But about 35 attendees rose in support of the Lewises, and Chris Lewis noted a Facebook page called “I Support Backyard Hens in Rome, GA” has more than 300 members.

Pouring permits suspended

In other actions, the City Commission approved three-day suspensions of the alcohol pouring licenses at Mi Alazan, 2 Central Plaza; El Toro, 2115 Shorter Ave.; and Stonebridge Grill, in the city-owned Stone­bridge Golf Club managed by Billy Casper Golf.

Mi Alazan and El Toro will not be allowed to serve alcohol this Thursday, Friday and Saturday. The suspension at Stonebridge is for Friday, Saturday and Sunday.

The restaurants were caught serving minors during a September police sting operation.

The Alcohol Control Commission has recommended a two-day penalty at Stone­bridge but the board voted 5-4 to match the punishment at the other venues. In favor were Wachsteter, Collins, Slack, Irmscher and Mayor Evie McNiece. Opposed were Canada, Doss, Lee and Redding.

Canada called for the ACC to establish consistency in its penalties, which can range from a letter of warning to multi-day suspensions for the same offense.
Comments
(19)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
tedb3rd
|
October 25, 2012
Look quick before the editors move the pin on the map at the beginning of the article. Because right now, it screams STEREOTYPE.
3isEnough
|
October 25, 2012
Now that the chicken cluck-up is settled, can someone do something about our neighbors dogs who bark night after night after night. Oh, tried talking to them. It is not their dogs that are barking.
dialup
|
October 25, 2012
anyone against this ever been down to Key West Fla ? Old Towne Key West- chickens everywhere and it's actually a good thing. Not only do they provide some eggs for drunk people's breakfasts they also eat up tons of bugs. Marietta GA allows chickens too within reason - if they didnt the Hispanic population would move to some other area of ATL where you can have chickens. I like the photo with this story- you can see the commissioners PC screens showing pictures of those dangerous offensive chickens. This story will morph into - "eggs of permitted city chickens stolen by teenagers and used in drive-by egging county wide!"
PalominoGold
|
October 25, 2012
It's ridiculous to try to zone out poultry with the way Rome is set up. In some neighborhoods, one house is county, the next is city, the next is county, etc. So if I'm the city house, I can't have poultry but my 2 neighbors can? Not right.
davidwe
|
October 25, 2012
This is not the 50's. Animal control is already overburdened with complaints about dogs and cats and ya want to add chickens. Jeez. If ya want poultry live in the frickin country.

Comm51
|
October 24, 2012
I wonder also if we need to do a study about the use of the track at Barron Stadium by the chickens of Rome since commissioners also did not feel that it was appropriate for residents to use it until the felt popular pressure.
Comm51
|
October 24, 2012
There are plenty of dogs that are more irritating than any chicken I've met. When I'm out running or walking with my kids we're watching for dogs, but I always enjoy hearing a hen cluck or a rooster crow. Barking is a lot louder than crowing or clucking. I've yet to feel threatened by chickens.
RQ0507
|
October 24, 2012
I think I have a bigger problem with what I am "allowed" to do on my own property. First I paid for my property in cash, second I pay hundreds of dollars per year to the county in taxes to own my property, and thirdly, it is private property. I understand there have to be laws and regulations but there seems to be an overabundance of bureaucratic tape, pay offs, and concern. Local, organic, sustainable food is what we need, and here we have government trying to stand in the the way. It makes no sense unless they are simply more concerned about padding pockets of large businesses rather than the welfare of the people of this city.
concerned4floyd
|
October 24, 2012
One of my children spent over 2 years in a third world country as a peace corps volunteer. Consequently I have spent time in this third world county and believe there is much that Americans can learn that is good from this struggling country. They will raise a few chickens here in Rome if allowed. This controversy is interesting and funny! No matter what is decided, I think we are snobs if we think that a third world country has nothing good to teach us here in the USA.
Jeatonm
|
October 23, 2012
Urban and suburban cooping is neither new nor controversial...at least when reasonable people are involved. The trend towards locally-sourced food has encouraged suburbanites to take control of their own diets.

Who benefits from bans on raising our own food? Big agribusiness. People talk about freedom so often these days, yet they don't seem to understand what that means. Where is the harm in someone raising laying hens on their own property under sanitary conditions?

Oh, right. There is no harm. There's just damage to the graft-laden pockets of the local officials.
SillyRoman
|
October 23, 2012
FYI: You can still order a virgin margarita and sneak your own tequila in the restaurant... Just be discreet and no one will bug you! It's how we got by before we turned 21...
DrugByTheNeck
|
October 23, 2012
I've got friends all over the nation in some really nice cities with perfectly legal chickens, yet Romans can't handle a few people with hens?

Rome is just backwards. It's a hateful little controlling place where everyone thinks that if it looks 'nice' it is nice, but it's rotten and hateful to the core, and that's ok, as long as it looks nice.

Old grandpa might have molested his step kids but social memory has let that pass, now all we know is grandpa goes to church every week and has a manicured lawn and a caddy in the driveway. How lucky I am to have him for a neighbor.

You want to talk about disease? How about cancer from all the pesticides that grandpa is putting all over that lawn that's washing off into the water you drink and cook with?

Oh, but it looks good! That's the Rome way! Go to church and hate your neighbors! The only right way of life is YOUR way.

varda
|
October 23, 2012
I'm sad to say, but I agree!!
Icarus10
|
October 23, 2012
Let freedom ring, we want our chickens!
joe_taxpayer
|
October 23, 2012
I would much rather have a few chickens next door than the pile of trash I have to look at every time I walk out my front door. Why don't the commissioners quit worrying about chickens and start making people clean up around their yards and houses.
JPond
|
October 23, 2012
Backyard poultry does not make a city a third world country. They are allowed in Atlanta, Decatur, Roswell, and Cherokee County among other places, and no one would mistake Buckhead for a third world country. Responsible people take care of their animals, their houses, and their property. Irresponsible people do not take care of their property, and cause loss of value, disease, and other community blight. 100 years ago the Government considered it a patriotic duty for each household to have two hens per person. It reduced the strain on the community during tough times. Commissioner Canada is right; this is not going away.
cybrguys
|
October 23, 2012
As long as the chickens are not running loose all over the neighbor hood and as long as there is not a smell I dont see the problem thats whats wrong with these places now you buy your house you pay your taxes you keep you place up and then the city has to stick it nose in. Years ago people had chicken and other stuff for food if you didnt grow it you didnt eat these high and might people need to get a life, If all the grocery stores close and resturant close guess who will still be eating LOL
RW.Hardin
|
October 23, 2012
Amen to that. In the 50's, flyers were passed out explaining that keeping egg-laying hens around was a GOOD thing.
DrugByTheNeck
|
October 23, 2012
It's still a good thing, and it's still being encouraged widely. Chickens eat a lot of ticks- but I guess we'd rather get lyme disease that's made it's way down here. Chickens eat a ton of bugs, but I guess we'd rather use pesticides. Chickens provide us with fertilizer, but I guess we'd rather our earth be sterile and chemical laden.

Anyone that SERIOUSLY reads, with half a brain, doesn't argue that chickens cause disease and lowers property values. That's the oldest, most stale thinking in the world. Some people need to get out of the 1950s.

They won't though, not here. We've got public nuisance laws that can ALREADY take care of any problems with noise or running free or anything.

As for smell, I would like to know WHY the average person ASSUMES that 5 or so chickens in a backyard is going to smell just like a commercial chicken house?

The nastiness and inhumanity of the commercial chicken houses are what most backyard chicken owners are trying to avoid.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.