Hotel, retail projects get new deadline
by Diane Wagner, staff writer
Nov 13, 2012 | 6665 views | 9 9 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Two proposed commercial projects on city-owned properties remain alive after the Rome City Commission extended on Monday the developers’ expiring options to buy.

R.H. Ledbetter Properties will have through Dec. 31, 2014, to complete its due diligence and get permits to build a 300,000-square-foot shopping center on Riverside Parkway.

The development, which is being watched closely by local environmentalists with the Coosa River Basin Initiative, would be across from Ridge Ferry Park on 83 acres stretching to Turner McCall Boulevard.

David Doss’s Samson Developers will get through Jan. 2, 2013, to close its deal for a major full-service hotel on West Third Street across from Barron Stadium. City Manager John Bennett said there are now two hotel chains interested in Doss’ project.

“They think they’ll know something in about 30 days, but they want to get past the first of the year,” Commissioner

Kim Canada said. “Once they decide on a hotel, things will start moving pretty fast.”

The project would redevelop 2.2 acres on the Oostanaula River that formerly housed the Rome-Floyd Parks and Recreation Authority headquarters.

A second phase on 2.2 adjacent acres would include owner-occupied condominiums and retail shops.

The Riverside Parkway development, on a former city landfill, has been under study since April 2007 and tempers flared during the board’s caucus session.

Joe Cook, CRBI executive director and Riverkeeper, said his organization is holding firm to protecting Burwell Creek and the wetlands on the site. When Cook warned that legal action would be taken if necessary, Canada launched into an angry tirade and E. Wright Ledbetter likened the threat to extortion.

“You are a citizen and you represent a worthy organization, but you’re trying to extort a seat at the table,” Ledbetter said.

Cook said he just wanted to point out that “if we’re ignored, we’re left with little recourse.”

Mayor Evie McNiece reminded Cook and Ledbetter that they’ve been able to find common ground in the past, and suggested they repair that relationship. The two went into a huddle after the caucus to further discuss the issues.

Commissioner Sue Lee was the lone “no” vote to extending the Ledbetter option. She said she wants the area preserved as greenspace in the heart of the city.

“There are other places to build a mall,” she said. “Do you think New York City would sell a part of Central Park for development?”

Ledbetter Properties has already spent $1.2 million on design, engineering, legal fees and permitting.

A permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was suspended last year after CRBI raised objections to its effect on the creek. The company has since withdrawn its application and is revising its site plan.

Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
3isEnough
|
November 15, 2012
It's all BUILD BUILD BUILD when it comes to new shopping centers in Rome. Let's see. A new one is planned in West Rome. Guess the city forgot about the fairly empty plazas over by Lowes. Now, Riverside? Hey, did the city listen to the new mall owners? Correct me if I read incorrectly, but the RNT article stated that the mall owners were quite surprised by how disjointed shopping is in Rome. Why aren't new plazas being built AROUND the mall (and not down the street or on the new connector?) How can you grow the mall area, when you are building new retail strips all over town. Do the city planners realize when enough is enough? Or does the city even know how to build and grow ONE shopping 'mecca'? Many thriving malls have large retail strips around them. What does Rome do? Leave old centers empty, and a mile down the street they OK to build a new one.
anabelle_lee
|
November 15, 2012
Hooray for Mr. Cook. These people are used to getting their way and it seems that he does not intimidate easily. What is this aboout exorting a seat at the table. Pure arrogance. We all have a seat at the table if it is public owned.
Lookoutlady
|
November 15, 2012
I sure would like to read Voter's "lengthy comment."

It has not yet been posted. Why?
CTShaw
|
November 14, 2012
This greenspace/wetland is ours, the citizens of Rome. Continued use as public greenspace is the best use of this land. Sale to Ledbetter or any other private entity is short-sighted and not in our best interest or that of our children and grandchildren. What a wonderful spot in the middle of our city will this greenspace seem in a hundred years when the surrounding land is much further developed. I do not oppose all development, of course, but this is wetland, it is part of our parkland, it connects Jackson Hill with Ridge Ferry Park, it filters pollution from our urban watershed, it houses intown wildlife, it stores floodwaters that would otherwise fill stores and homes. Our city commission should listen to its citizens, and no organization better represents the environmental interests of our area than CRBI. To call its efforts for a "seat at the table" extortion is insulting to this citizen of Rome.

Thank you Sue Hamler Lee for your principled stand for our children and the future of our beautiful city.
StevenLH
|
November 14, 2012
As a member of Coosa River Basin Initiative, I'm concerned about the confrontational attitude of Mr. Ledbetter and few Rome City Commissioners. We have always had a cooperative and productive relationship until now. The goal of CRBI is to prevent the Riverside Parkway development but to ensure that the project be built without permanent damage to the valuable and unique natural resources at the site. Such a cooperative venture would be a win-win for developers and citizens alike.

Why would the city and Ledbetter Properties want to exclude input from a respected and dedicated expert like Joe Cook? Perhaps they are simply in a hurry to complete the project, but I can promise them that any time spent in properly preparing for the impact of the development on the environment will benefit both the citizens of Rome and the owners of the property. A vibrant City Center that nurtures native animals and plants would showcase the commitment of Floyd County to responsible stewardship of this beautiful God-given land.

Please call or write the City Commissioners and ask them to affirm their commitment to the partnership between economic well-being and a healthy, life-sustaining environment by accepting input from the Coosa River Basin Initiative.

Like the magnificent oaks that used to line Riverside Parkway, once the natural diversity of Burwell Creek is gone, it's gone.
StevenLH
|
November 14, 2012
Oops-that third sentence should read "The goal of CRBI is NOT to prevent the Riverside Parkway development but to ensure that the project be built without permanent damage to the valuable and unique natural resources at the site."

A cut and paste error, not a Freudian slip. We know that (assuming that all permits are granted) the project is a done deal. We simply want the result to be one that we can all be proud of.
TheSeer
|
November 13, 2012
Under that theory, no one should be permitted to build a new house as long as there is an empty house somewhere for them to live. No new car can be manufactured so long as there are used cars available.
3isEnough
|
November 15, 2012
Agree. However, good city planning means making an area 'retail' and growing that area' Rome builds here. Builds there. That store there moves to the new plaza. The old plaza sits empty. And people are stuck driving here and there to shop since there is not one central location.
Oostanaula
|
November 13, 2012
Need to fill the empty commercial buildings in Rome first before building more and destroying more of the environment.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.