Man in motorized wheelchair injured in downtown wreck
by Doug Walker, Associate Editor
Nov 20, 2012 | 11090 views | 12 12 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
A wreck near the intersection of Broad Street and Second Avenue sent a man to the hospital during lunchtime traffic. (Doug Walker, Rome News-Tribune)
A wreck near the intersection of Broad Street and Second Avenue sent a man to the hospital during lunchtime traffic. (Doug Walker, Rome News-Tribune)
slideshow
A man in a motorized wheelchair was sent to the hospital after a service van collided with him at the intersection of Broad Street and Second Avenue this morning. (Doug Walker, Rome News-Tribune)
A man in a motorized wheelchair was sent to the hospital after a service van collided with him at the intersection of Broad Street and Second Avenue this morning. (Doug Walker, Rome News-Tribune)
slideshow
UPDATE: One man was taken to the Floyd Medical Center following a collision between a service van and a motorized wheelchair at Second Avenue and Broad Street on Tuesday morning.

According to a Rome police report:

Thomas D. Henderson, 60, of Rome, was waiting to cross Second Avenue at LaMarie’s when the traffic light turned green for vehicles on Broad Street.

According to the driver of the van, Ricky Hames, he then made a right turn off Broad Street onto Second Avenue when Henderson apparently pulled out from the sidewalk and clipped the right rear quarter panel of the van.

Henderson, who was complaining of back pain and taken to Floyd Medical Center, was determined at fault for failing to yield to traffic.

One man was transported to the Floyd Medical Center following a collision between a service van and a motorized wheelchair at Second Avenue and Broad Street Tuesday morning.

According to the driver of the van, Ricky Hames, he had made a right turn off Broad Street onto Second Avenue and the wheelchair operator apparently pulled out from the sidewalk at LaMarie’s and clipped the right rear quarter-panel at the rear of the van.

A Redmond Regional Medical Center ambulance was within a block and stopped to render assistance to the victim who was complaining of back pain. The victim was transported by the Redmond crew to the Floyd Medical Center.

Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
candygun
|
November 21, 2012
I have heard reports of organized gangs,working as a crew to further their agenda and fund an underground network of illegal drag racing and tug-of-war matches...
tedb3rd
|
November 20, 2012
If you're gonna' get yourself hit, get hit by a service van. ...bigger pockets to help compensate for, "back pain."
Trelicious
|
November 20, 2012
Don't forget the lingering migraines, insomnia and lack of consortium.
CallingBS
|
November 20, 2012
These motorized chairs were never intended to be driven to Atlanta and back. They're for moving around inside your house or perhaps your yard. Yet, people drive these things all over town. I saw one the other day go diagonally across the intersection of 5th Avenue and Turner McCall.And its usually morbidly obese people who should be walking instead of being a traffic hazard. I'm sorry this individual got injured, but I think its time the City Police started enforcing the law before somebody gets killed.
sgreen181
|
November 20, 2012
Shame on you Calling BS. It is obvious that no one close to you is disabled or heavy. To so this is the only way to get around and crossing the street is not against the law as long as you do it at crosswalks!!!!
Trelicious
|
November 20, 2012
That is funny. Go down Maple Street at night. It's like playing dodgeball.
DannyBuck
|
November 20, 2012
Did you know that walkers are hit every day across America. I say America because this person that was disabled like many of us are and has as much right to take his chair any where your legs take you. I have seen walkers go diagonal there also. Permanently disabled veteran here and offended by your statement.
alan34
|
November 21, 2012
I see a guy riding his motorized wheel chair down Redmond road every day. He lives in the West Rome projects and goes to Walmart, and down Martha berry and shorter avenue on it. It's just a matter of time before he gets hit and you can write that down. Something definitely needs to be done by law enforcement for their protection because they definitely don't protect themselves.
schnitzeldo
|
November 21, 2012
The first three sentences of your comment are seriously hilarious. Makes me think of the time I was driving down N. 5th Ave. by the high rises and came upon what I thought must have been a parade. There were 7 or 8 in a single-file line driving down the road, and the last one had one of those tall, orange flags on the back.
Casket
|
November 21, 2012
all of this could have been solved if it had been equipped with the anti-tipping mechanism they had in that one south park episode...
RWeber23
|
November 24, 2012
CallingBS is absolutely right. (About the use of the chairs, I don't know about the morbidly obese thing). Those of you who are offended by this should get over it, I don't think he or she is saying what you think.

I'm not disabled and I manage not to get hit by cars because I don't walk into traffic. You say these chairs are the only way they can get around, and that's absolutely right. However, crossing properly at crosswalks, not in the middle of an intersection, travelling on sidewalks, not the middle of the road - these things are common sense. The chairs are the way they get around since they can not WALK. They take the place of walking, not the place of a motor vehicle, so they should follow the same precautions a pedestrian should.

That is what CallingBS meant. Not that these chairs shouldn't be allowed out and about, but that they should be subject to the same laws as a pedestrian, not a vehicle. Be a part of traffic or be on the sidewalk. Not both. The same logic should apply to bicycles, walkers, anyone - disabled or otherwise.
dbeall
|
November 25, 2012
Since these devices are not registered as motor vehicles with a tag, I find it difficult to believe it is legal to drive one on the road. I'm guessing it is likely legal to use them any where you want on the sidewalk and for crossing streets at the sidewalk, but I would hesitate to use the device as a primary mode of transportation.

The wiser choice would be to carry the device in a handicap accessible van or on the back of a car as is sometimes done. Those that are commenting are commenting about safety issues.

Mr. Buck thank you for your service to our great nation. I am sure nobody intended to offend you. But a walker has a far greater ability to get out of the way of a car if that situation arises. No offense intended sir.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.