SPLOST committee begins process to determine projects at their first meeting
by Jeremy Stewart, Staff Writer
Mar 22, 2013 | 1794 views | 1 1 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
download Summary of Past SPLOST Referendums
Eric Hunt (center) speaks during Thursday’s SPLOST Committee meeting in the Community Room of the Floyd County Administration Building while fellow members Brad Doyle (left) and Jim Howell listen. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
Eric Hunt (center) speaks during Thursday’s SPLOST Committee meeting in the Community Room of the Floyd County Administration Building while fellow members Brad Doyle (left) and Jim Howell listen. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
slideshow
SPLOST Committee members Tripp Bagby (from left), Alvin Jackson and Jim Bojo take part in Thursday's first meeting of the group. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
SPLOST Committee members Tripp Bagby (from left), Alvin Jackson and Jim Bojo take part in Thursday's first meeting of the group. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
slideshow
Rome City Manager John Bennett (left) discuses some of the past SPLOST packages that the city and county have put forward at Thursday's meeting of the 2013 SPLOST Citizen Committee, chaired by David Newby (seated).
Rome City Manager John Bennett (left) discuses some of the past SPLOST packages that the city and county have put forward at Thursday's meeting of the 2013 SPLOST Citizen Committee, chaired by David Newby (seated).
slideshow
Introductions were made and some guidance was given Thursday at the first official meeting of the 2013 Rome-Floyd SPLOST Citizens Committee.

The group, comprised of 11 members and Chairman David Newby, was given information on how state law regulates 1-cent special purpose, local option sales tax and some history on past referendums.

“I have not been in a community where there is such a great cooperation between the citizens and the cities and county,” Newby said. “The people here understand this is a very important committee and we must choose the programs and projects that will benefits the needs of this community.”

For most of the next three to four months, the committee will hear proposals from the elected boards of Cave Spring, Rome, and Floyd County as well as residents on what should be a part of the proposed SPLOST package.

A questionnaire that residents will be asked to fill out and turn in to the committee to request specific projects is expected to be finalized and made public, including online, after next week.

The committee will then work to create a recommended list of projects to be funded.

“This is not an easy committee to be a part of,” Rome Mayor Evie McNiece said. “But it is one of the most rewarding you’ll ever serve on.”

Interim County Manager Gary Burkhalter made the members aware that the deadline to come up with a list is Aug. 26. The county will then have to work to meet certain deadlines in order to get the referendum on the Nov. 5 ballot.

A summary of past SPLOST referendums was given by Rome City Manager John Bennett, who has been a part of each one of them since the first one in 1986.

“I think we need to recognize as a committee the fact that all of the counties around us — Chattooga, Gordon, Polk, and Bartow — all have SPLOSTs,” Bennett said.

“They are making an investment in their communities. If you look around the state, the success rate of SPLOST referendums passing is still very high. That tells you that people are willing to make that investment.”
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
coosatown
|
March 23, 2013
The attached list of past SPLOST votes very clearly indicates Floyd/Rome voters MUST know specifics of the projects. Commissioners, don't ask for money and then find projects to squander it. The first articles in RN-T indicated you want the money, but have no definitive projects for infrastructure.Do we need a SPLOST? Yes. Will it pass in today's economic climate? No.We are not as dumb as we look. Really, we're not.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.