“We have not heard anything from the judge (J. Bryant Durham) yet, and he’s on vacation this week,” Smith told his board of directors Tuesday night. “I sincerely pray that this comes to an end soon in a positive way.”
South Rome Redevelopment Executive Director Karen Moore told the board that if something doesn’t happen with the project soon, Phase Two, which involves all of the single family housing proposed for Etowah Terrace, may be lost.
“If we don’t have significant resolution, we’re going to lose Phase One as well,” Moore said.
If that happens, Mercy Housing may be forced to return state tax credits and make a difficult decision about resubmitting the project all over again.
Smith and Moore both indicated that Phase One, a 77-unit apartment complex for low-to-moderate income senior citizens across from the historic Myrtle Hill Cemetery, needs to be under construction by early September.
The Mount Aventine Community Association, Save Etowah Terrace and individual property owners Michael and Wanda Randolph filed legal challenges to the rezoning of the property. In May, the city of Rome and South Rome Redevelopment asked Durham to issue a summary judgment ruling that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to challenge the zoning. Durham has yet to rule on that motion.
Moore worried what kind of message surrendering the tax credits might send to state officials.
“It’s going to be very embarrassing for everyone,” Moore said.
“We really need to pray about this,” Smith said.
In other business:
Moore told the board that a pre-application submitted to the Neighbor Works America program, which provides financial support to nonprofit agencies involved in housing, is in the review process, and South Rome should find out in August if it receives approval to submit a formal application for assistance.
The board agreed to move forward with another Many Voices concert this fall or winter. Proceeds will be used to help scholarship students in programs offered by the South Rome unit of the Boys & Girls Club.








The McCall piece, part of Phase II, came up recently. It was not a "Hail Mary" pass, as you called it. The opportunity to restore McCall Hospital came up after the building was declared unsafe for occupation and the tenants were moved out. The property is in foreclosure, in deep disrepair, and is crying out for someone to step in and do something with it. Mercy was given the opportunity to view the property and were excited at the possibility of restoring it. (They have, in fact, already restored a historic hospital in Savannah.) The concept was presented to SET and MACA with the purpose of inviting them to help and participate in the project. It would be wonderful if they would do so.
The reference to single-family housing at McCall (as part of Phase II) was an error by a reporter. It would be multi-family housing, but it would not be limited to senior citizens as would be Etowah Village. The reason that I "bundle" McCall and Etowah together is because both of these blighted properties would be redeveloped and restored by Mercy. They would be Phase I and Phase II of a larger project.
I resent your characterization of Karen Moore as "incompetent" and an "obstacle". If you actually attended the SRRA/SRRC meetings each month (like I do) you wouldn't be so misinformed about Ms. Moore or about the redevelopment efforts overall. It is sad that you put forth such strident, negative comments when you haven't taken the time to actually learn the facts about what is going on. The caricature of Ms. Moore that you have made could not be further from the truth. If you are really interested in South Rome (which I doubt) and care about the redevelopment efforts (which again, I doubt) then you would take the time to attend meetings and perhaps even ask for a meeting with Ms. Moore herself to ask questions and get answers from the source.
I ask you yet one more time: Should the judge allow SET's lawsuit to proceed, are you going to take some of your large investment here in Rome to help pay the lawyer to take the case to trial? Would you really be willing to invest thousands of dollars to halt the redevelopment of South Rome? Do you really hate poor people that much, to spend your own money to see that South Rome is left in the terrible state it is now?
And what did you really mean by the population of Etowah Village "spilling" into downtown? I am completely unclear on what you meant with that comment, as are others.
As to the population there "spilling" into downtown, I don't understand what you really mean. Would you please elaborate on that for us?
Voter, I do not blame SET or its lawsuit for the state of South Rome, which indeed is the result of years and years of neglect. I do, however, blame the lawsuit for bringing much of the redevelopment project to a halt and stopping the renaissance of Etowah Terrace. Due to the lawsuit we now stand at risk for losing Etowah Village entirely, and the proposed Phase II (including the restoration of McCall hospital) as well. It is very sad that such a small group of people could prevent the creation of assets that would benefit literally hundreds of other people in my community.
I ask you again: Should the judge allow SET's lawsuit to proceed, are you going to take some of your large investment here in Rome to help pay the lawyer to take the case to trial? Would you really be willing to invest thousands of dollars to halt the redevelopment of South Rome? Do you really hate poor people that much, to spend your own money to see that South Rome is left in the terrible state it is now?
Yep, and when he went back to Washington, he was rejected by Pelosi, Reid, Frank and Obama, with their comments that "What's he doing here? This is a done deal. WE'VE already gotten it taken care of. WE'VE got OUR PLAN in place. HE'S just messing it up."
The Stimulous Bill WAS WRITTEN, PLANNED, AND PUT INTO EFFECT by the Democratic majority that CONTROLLED Congress.
The Reublicans who joined in with almost 100% Democratic supporters have paid, and are continuing to pay, at the ballot box.
It's fine to blame Bush for what he's responsible for. He asked for this crap, and crap is what he got. But let's not be DISTORTIONIST'S when it comes to history.
McCain suspended campaign...McCain rejected by Pelosi, Reid, etc....Democrats pass bill, which they wrote, with some Republican support,...Republicans who sided with the Democrat majority get hammered at the polls. End of story.
And what about the undesirable elements that infest Etowah Terrace right now? Maybe if you actually lived in South Rome and had to deal with the reality of life here, you'd feel differently. It is easy to sit in Summerville Park and opine about what other neighborhoods should do.
Do you also oppose the streetscape project? We "undesirable elements" in South Rome probably don't deserve nice sidewalks, new streetlights and repaired retaining walls, do we?
Should the judge allow SET's lawsuit to proceed, are you going to take some of your large investment here in Rome to help pay the lawyer to take the case to trial? Would you really be willing to invest thousands of dollars to halt the redevelopment of South Rome? Do you really hate poor people that much, to spend your own money to see that South Rome is left in the terrible state it is now?
Sourcebook: I thank you for the much needed comments supporting removing those dilapated, drug dealer infested buildings SET and a select few MACA residents are trying to save. Like you, I am STILL waiting for honest explanations to the lawsuit. Yeah, yeah, yeah, we all know the obvious reasons, but what are the REAL reasons behind it? If SET/MACA(again a select number) are willing to settle now, why did they file the lawsuit in the first place? Im sure we will never get a complete answer. At the next tent revival I'll pray that justice will prevail.
I don't pray, but I sincerely hope both sides can come to an agreement on this issue that is mutually satisfactory -- emphasis on "mutual."
I'm not interested in debating issues with you. Your mind (and heart) appear to be closed.
Everyone's opinion counts. It just would be sooooo helpful if you would get your facts straight.
You don't seem to have a very good opinion of the City of Rome. Perhaps you should consider moving
across a bigger sea of water. You might be a less negative person.,
So, do you think the number of signs posted on the property (tract vs. individual lots) should cost the community 200 construction jobs? Much less the loss of outside, private investment and $50,000 annual payment to the local tax digest. The lawsuit appears to be petty to me.
I sincerely hope that even if SET is successful in derailing the redevelopment that the city and SRRA/SRRC move forward with the demolition of the houses on Etowah Terrace - ALL of them. At the very least a major eyesore for South Rome will be gone. I'd much rather look at an empty lot than continue to see those shacks standing, inviting vagrants to set up housekeeping.
It would be interesting to know what this costly litigation is really all about. Is it about saving Etowah Terrace? After years and years of neglect there is nothing left to save. Go look.
Is it about the lost dream of an arts district for that location? Even the consultants who drafted the original master plan had serious reservations about the financial implementation of an arts district. The master plan calls for a local tax payer subsity for the artists and for RACA to be the fiduciary agent for the effort. The local supporters of the arts are doing a great job of surviving during tough economic times. They do not need to be in the real estate business.
Is it about the vision that everyone in South Rome would be a homeowner? Residents who still are holding on to that concept need visit other communities where redevelopment has taken place and become educated on the realities of development. Having affordable housing choices is a must for any community that wants to turn itself around.
The South Rome community has everything on the line now due to the lawsuit filed by so few. There is a 10.5 million dollar investment, the restoration of the McCall Hospital, and the opportunity to support the Board of Education by attracting new families into a neighborhood that would have great housing and a great new school. The streetscape will tie all that together and South Rome would become the desirable neighborhood it was many years ago.
A new low-income complex for seniors has just been completed on Pennington Avenue. Why has Mt. Aventine/SET not objected to this development?
South Rome residents and the broader community deserve some honest answers.